All posts by Mark

About Mark

Mark Poole is a writer and director of both drama and documentary. His most recent film Fearless about 92 year old playwright Julia Britton recently screened on ABC1. His career began when the feature film he wrote, A Single Life, won an AFI Award in 1987. Since then he has written more than 20 hours of broadcast television drama, won a directing award for the short film Basically Speaking at the St Kilda Film Festival, and was honoured with a major AWGIE, the Richard Lane Award in 2008.

Netflix commissions Brouhaha Entertainment’s ‘Boy Swallows Universe’ adaptation

by Sean Slatter IF magazine March 4, 2022

Trent Dalton (Image: Russell Shakespeare)

Netflix has ordered Brouhaha Entertainment’s adaptation of Trent Dalton’s Boy Swallows Universe, more than two years after publisher HarperCollins announced it had sold the screen rights to the author’s debut novel.

Happy Feet scribe John Collee will write an eight-part series based on the semi-autobiographical book, which has gone on to sell more than 500,000 copies since its release in 2018.

The story centres on Eli Bell, a young boy growing up in Brisbane during the 1980s that is forced to navigate a lost father, a mute brother, a junkie mum, a heroin dealer for a stepfather, and a notorious crim for a babysitter.

Executive producing are Troy Lum and Andrew Mason of Brouhaha, alongside Blue-Tongue Films’ Joel Edgerton, Chapter One’s Sophie Gardiner, and Anonymous Content’s Kerry Roberts.

The project has been in the works since 2019 when Lum and Mason were at Hopscotch Pictures, with the pair teaming with UK producer Gabrielle Tana to form Brouhaha Entertainment last year.

In a statement, Dalton said he had always dreamed about what it would be like to see stories on his television screen from the world he knew.

“When I was a boy, television was an escape,” he said.

“You can’t see the holes in the fibro walls when all you see is Winnie Cooper’s face on The Wonder Years.

“I never saw the world I knew in books, in movies, in television. That often brutal suburban Australian world that was just outside my window and the magical world secretly growing inside my head.

Boy Swallows Universe is every aspect of that world. And people across this wild earth are about to step inside that world with their ears and eyes and hearts wide open.”

Netflix director of originals in Australia Que Minh Luu said the commission was a coup for the streamer’s ANZ branch.

Boy Swallows Universe is truly something special, and it’s an enormous privilege to partner with Trent Dalton, Joel Edgerton, and Brouhaha Entertainment in bringing this genuinely iconic Australian story to Netflix,” she said.

“As Australians, we know how much investing in local content matters. Boy Swallows Universe is a major milestone in our mission to unearth uniquely local stories that bring joy and connection in unexpected ways to our audiences here at home, and throughout the world.”

Casting for the series is expected to start next week.

Stan/Nine co-order ‘Bali 2002’ with Claudia Jessie, Rachel Griffiths and Richard Roxburgh

by Sean Slatter IF magazine March 3, 2022

Claudia Jessie, Rachel Griffiths, and Richard Roxburgh.

Nine and Stan have co-commissioned a new four-part series based on the 2002 Bali bombings.

Production has begun in Western Sydney on the Screentime and Endemol Shine Australia drama, which is being developed in consultation with those directly impacted by the tragedy.

It’s been nearly 20 years since the terrorist attack on two of Kuta Beach’s busiest nightclubs killed 202 people, which saw local Balinese and Australian and British tourists scramble to rescue the injured and comfort the dying.

Bali 2002 is set to explore how everyday heroes from Bali, Australia, and beyond defied the odds to bring order from chaos and hope from despair.

Leading the cast are Rachel Griffiths and Richard Roxburgh, alongside Claudia Jessie (Bridgerton), Sean Keenan, Ewen Leslie and Arka Das.

There will also be appearances from a range of Australian and Balinese actors, including Anthony Wong, Paul Ayre, Maleeka Gasbari, Gerwin Widjaja, and Sri Ayu Jati Kartika.

Kerrie Mainwaring is producing for Screentime, with Tim Pye executive producer alongside Sara Richardson for Endemol Shine Australia, Michael Healy and Andy Ryan for the 9Network, and Cailah Scobie and Amanda Duthie for Stan.

Mainwaring said it was an important story for all Australians.

“We have worked hard to bring together this terrific cast and team of creatives to honour the story of all those Australians, Indonesians and others who experienced the terrible tragedy in Bali in 2002,” she said.

The series, which has major production investment from Screen Australia, in association with Screen NSW, marks the first original drama series co-commission between 9Network and Stan.

Healy, Nine director of television, said it would not be the last.

“It is a privilege for the 9Network and Stan to mark the 20th anniversary of the Bali bombings with this landmark drama,” he said.

“The Bali bombings were a turning point in Australian and Indonesian history and we are proud to have such an outstanding multinational cast and creative team on this project.

“Bali 2002 is first of many co-commissions between 9Network and Stan, and we look forward to making more announcements on these collaborations in the coming months.”

Scobie, Stan chief content officer, said the streamer was looking forward to continuing its close collaboration with the teams at the 9Network, Screentime and Endemol Shine Australia on the project.

“Developed in collaboration with world-class creatives from Australia and Indonesia, and in consultation with those directly impacted, Bali 2002 promises to be a powerful, inspiring, and sensitively told drama series that pays respect to everyday heroes from Australia, Bali, and beyond,” she said.

Endemol Shine Australia CEO Peter Newman said the company was “genuinely delighted to be on board for the project.

“ESA is incredibly proud to produce a series that means so much to so many. Triggered by an event that shocked the world, Bali 2002 is a story of resilience and heroism born from the darkest tragedy,” he said.

“This is a gripping four-part series that is evocative, sensitive and reflective of the stories that have been told directly from those impacted by this event.”

Bali 2002 will premiere later this year. Banijay Rights is responsible for international distribution.

Damage to The Steve Jaggi Company’s Brisbane studio as rain continues to lash east coast

by Sean Slatter IF magazine March 2, 2022

The Steve Jaggi Company’s Brisbane studio following the weekend’s rain.

Queensland’s The Steve Jaggi Company (SJC) has reported flood damage to its Brisbane studio facility from the deluge dumped on the state last weekend, as screen communities in affected areas remain on high alert.

Record-breaking downpours have devastated South East Queensland and Northern NSW across the past few days, flooding thousands of homes and leading to mass evacuations of regional towns.

In Brisbane, 80 per cent of the city’s annual rainfall fell across three days, while 30 suburbs across the wider region received more than 1,000mm.

SJC is among the businesses counting the cost of the weather event, which flooded its 650 square metre studio facility in inner north-eastern suburb of Albion, damaging props and costumes, as well as two cameras.

Founder and chief creative officer Steve Jaggi estimated that about 80 per cent or more of the building’s contents were destroyed, with the overall costs expected to “inch towards $500,000”.

“I’m hoping we can salvage some of the costumes because we have more than 2,000 items but I think the props are probably fully written off,” he said.

“The problem with floodwater is that it’s saltwater that has oil and sewerage, so once it mixes with prop materials such as wood and polystyrene, you pretty much have to write the props off.

Props and costumes in the Steve Jaggi Company Brisbane studio.

“We lost two cameras and two underwater housing systems, so just in terms of camera damage, we are talking more than $200,000.”

As IF reported last week, the company is currently working on its first project for 2022, Rhiannon Bannenberg’s Mistletoe Ranch.

Having wrapped that shoot on Friday, Jaggi said the company would be forced to reconfigure its schedule for the rest of the year as a result of the floods.

“We try to do a movie every two months give or take, so we have two movies we are working on as well as a television program that we are building sets and props for,” he said.

“The movies will probably be pushed back several months because of what we have lost.”

Elsewhere in the state, Screen Queensland says producers have so far not reported “any damage or major delays to their productions”, with CEO Kylie Munnich saying organisation will continue to support projects “to ensure they can continue to film”.

“Our thoughts are with everyone in Queensland and New South Wales who have suffered through this dreadful weather event,” she told IF.

Further south in NSW, Northern Rivers communities have borne the brunt of the damage this week, with Lismore getting more than 700mm of rain across 30 hours on Sunday and Monday, while residents of Ballina, North Ballina, and West Ballina were told to move to higher ground on Tuesday morning.

National not-for-profit organisation Screenworks is among the occupants of Ballina’s business district, operating out of an office on River Street.

The regional screen body was due to have its first webinar of the year – a session about finding pathways to audience with producer/director/writer Rosie Lourde and producer Hayley Adams – on Tuesday but decided to postpone it as a result of the unfolding floods.

CEO Ken Crouch told IF that while all of his staff had so far generally avoided being directly affected by the rising water levels, the wider screen community would take time to recover.

“Our office in Ballina will be closed this week but we expect it will remain above flood levels.

“We are all working from home to minimise travel, although technology like internet and phone is a bit sketchy across the region (a lot of roads are closed or damaged, so many of us couldn’t get to the office anyway).

“We all have friends and loved ones, in addition to Screenworks members and industry people, who have been impacted by what has happened in Lismore and across all of the region, so I expect that the next few days/weeks will be challenging for many as people recover and clean up from this disaster.”

Screenworks is currently raising funds to help screen practitioners and businesses in the Northern Rivers region who have been impacted by the floods. Find out more about how to donate here

‘Neighbours’ to end after Fremantle fails to secure UK broadcaster

by Sean Slatter IF Magazine March 3, 2022

Kylie Minogue as Charlene and Jason Donovan as Scott in ‘Neighbours’. (Photo: AAP Image/Ten)

The end is near for Australia’s longest running drama, Neighbours, after Fremantle confirmed that it had been unable to a new UK broadcast partner.

It comes after a month after Channel 5, the program’s main financial backer, announced it would not air the program beyond June.

There had been hope of the program continuing with a different broadcaster, however, Fremantle today released a statement saying it had been unable to find one.

“We are so sorry to say that after nearly 37 years and almost 9,000 episodes broadcast we have to confirm that Neighbours will cease production in June,” the spokesperson said.

“Following the loss of our key broadcast partner in the UK and despite an extensive search for alternative funding, we simply have no option but to rest the show.

“To our amazing, loyal fans, we know this is a huge disappointment, as it is to all of us on the team. We thank you for all your messages and support and promise to end the show on an incredible high. From here on, we are celebrating Neighbours.”

The soap has been responsible for launching the careers of people such as Jason Donovan, Kylie Minogue, Margot Robbie, and Liam Hemsworth, and has served as key training ground for industry, particularly writers and directors.

More than 60,000 fans signed a petition to save the series in the past few weeks.

‘Troppo’

A new Australian TV drama series Troppo began screening on ABC1 on Sunday 27 February 2022

Crime drama Troppo, starring Thomas Jane and Nicole Chamoun, is set to kick off the ABC’s 2022 Australian drama slate.

Created by Yolanda Ramke and inspired by Candice Fox’s novel Crimson Lake, Troppo is set in Far North Queensland and centres on Jane’s Ted Conkaffey, a disgraced ex-cop who is recruited by an ex-con turned private investigator, Amanda Pharrell (Chamoun) to solve the disappearance of a Korean family man and tech pioneer.

Set in the wilds of tropical Far North Queensland, Troppo centres on a disgraced ex-cop Ted Conkaffey (Thomas Jane), who is recruited by an ex-con turned private investigator, Amanda Pharrell (Nicole Chamoun), to solve the disappearance of a Korean family man and tech pioneer.

From crocodile infested waters to a tech start-up’s headquarters, this unlikely pair of investigators poke their noses where they’re not wanted – much to the annoyance of the local police. As they edge closer to the truth, exposing the underbelly of the Crimson Lake community and opening old wounds, they find themselves plunged into a fight for survival.

Troppo is an EQ Media Group and Beyond Entertainment production in association with Renegade Entertainment. Karl Zwicky is the series producer, with executive producers Greg Quail, Lisa Duff and Simonne Overend (EQ Media Group), Mikael Borglund and David Ogilvy (Beyond Entertainment); Stuart Ford and Lourdes Diaz and co-EP Matt Bankston (AGC Studios); Sally Riley and Andrew Gregory (ABC); and Thomas Jane and Courtney Lauren Penn (Renegade Entertainment); and Ramke.

The script producer was Jane Allen, with writers Blake Ayshford, Penelope Chai, Kodie BedfordCraig Irvin and Andrew Lee. Jocelyn Moorhouse was the set-up director, alongside Catherine Millar, Grant Brown, and co-directors Ramke and Ben Howling. 

Major production finance comes from the ABC, AGC Studios in association with Aperture Media Partners, and Screen Australia in association with Screen Queensland and with support from the City of Gold Coast.

The eight-part drama will premiere February 27 at 8.30pm on ABC TV, with all episodes available to binge on ABC iview.

Greg Woods appointed Fremantle Australia CEO as company announces new structure

by Sean Slatter IF Magazine February 25, 2022

The cast of ‘Heartbreak High’.

Fremantle Australia has named Greg Woods as CEO while outlining a new company structure that will bring its entertainment, reality, and gameshows under Eureka Productions.

Having replaced previous CEO Chris Oliver-Taylor in an interim capacity following his departure to Netflix at the end of last year, Woods will now lead the company as it focuses on drama, documentary, and factual programming, such as upcoming ABC surfing drama Barons and Netflix’s Heartbreak High reboot.

The restructure means Chris Culvenor and Paul Franklin’s Eureka Productions, which Fremantle increased its majority stake in last year, will take over production on titles such as Australia’s Got TalentAustralian Idol and Farmer Wants A Wife.

Prior to taking the top job, Woods served as Fremantle’s chief financial officer for nearly 14 years.

He said he was “incredibly excited” to be taking the reins at the company.

“I am so very proud to be working with the most talented and passionate people who will shape the irresistible content of the future,” he said.

Fremantle CEO Jennifer Mullin said he was well suited to the top job.

“Greg has been a key part of the Fremantle Australia leadership team for 13 years, this is a natural progression at an exciting time for the business,” she said.

“And I have known and worked with Chris and Paul for many years and have no doubt that our entertainment catalogue in Australia will continue to thrive in their hands.”

AWG launches initiative to give writers their ‘First Break’

by Jackie Keast IF magazine March 1, 2022

Chris Corbett and Catherine Kelleher.

Once upon a time, a young writer looking to cut their teeth might have started out in an entry-level role on a series like A Country PracticeMcLeod’s Daughters or All Saints.

Those long-running dramas provided a training ground for aspiring scribes, offering long-term employment in large teams where they could build skills and networks.

Today, with the exception of flagship serials Home & Away and Neighbours, long-running drama has all but disappeared from our screens (and as is well documented, Neighbours‘ future is uncertain). With it, the traditional training opportunities for new writers and directors have been reduced; the trend towards higher budget, shorter-run premium drama means there is often less capacity for producers and broadcasters to take a risk on a new face.

Over the past five years, the Australian Writers’ Guild (AWG) has observed the demand for competent note-takers and script co-ordinators has often exceeded supply, while at the same time, aspiring writers with limited networks are unsure as to how to get a foot in the door.

“There is no formal tertiary training for note-takers and script coordinators,” AWG professional development manager Susie Hamilton tells IF.

“It’s the sort of thing that people learn on the job. The problem is, how do you get that job without first gaining the skills? And when you do get the chance to be a note-taker in a writers’ room, how do you know what’s expected of you and how to deliver what is required?”

To redress the conundrum, with the support of Screen NSW, AWG has opened applications today for First Break – a three-day workshop program that will cover note-taking, script coordinating and the basics of a writers’ room.

While only open to NSW residents at this time, the guild hopes to roll the program out across Australia over the next year.

First Break builds upon previous note-taker and script coordinating workshops run by the AWG, while also combining them with “vital training in writers’ room etiquette and process”. First Break is designed to be practical, and lead to paid work.

“The role of the note-taker is a crucial one in a writers’ room. Creating a perfect set of notes requires a specific set of skills, and nailing it requires a completely different approach from screenwriting,” says Hamilton.

“The first workshop will guide participants in how to create detailed and accurate notes. The second workshop will explain what a script coordinator does and how they operate within a production office. Finally, they will learn the etiquette, expectations and hierarchy of a writers’ room. This is a vital element of First Break, ensuring that participants are well placed to take full advantage of the opportunity to work in a writers’ room and to build on it.”

The program will be facilitated by Chris Corbett (Halifax: Retribution, My Life is Murder, Newton’s Law, Miss Fisher’s Murder Mysteries) and SBS development executive Catherine Kelleher, who has worked as a script coordinator, producers assistant and note-taker on series such as The Letdown, Glitch, A Place to Call Home, The Heights, The Secret She Keeps and Little J & Big Cuz.

Following the successful completion of these three workshops, each writer will be added to the AWG’s Pathways website on the new ‘First Break’ tab.

The cohort will then be promoted to industry using the AWG’s databases including its 9,700 subscribers to the AWG newsletter, the 500+ registered users of the Pathways portal (producers, directors, writers and industry professionals) and the 1,000 subscribers to the Pathways Newsletter.

The need for programs like First Break seems highlighted as Neighbours‘ future hangs in doubt.

Neighbours is jokingly referred to as Neighbours University for a reason,” Hamilton says.

“It’s been a place where, for decades, emerging talent have been able to learn necessary skills and hone their talent. 

“If we lose Neighbours from our screens, there will be even fewer opportunities for new writers and that will be to the detriment of the Australian film and TV industry now and well into the future. 

“The AWG is constantly evolving its approach to developing professional development opportunities for writers. The industry landscape is changing, and we are adapting our offering to complement it. The idea behind First Break was to fill that ‘training ground’ gap left by the absence of long-running series.”

Applications close for First Break at 5pm, March 25, with the successful 12 applicants to be announced May 4. First Break will be held via Zoom over the first three Saturdays in June 2022 and applicants must be able to attend each of the workshops on the set dates. Apply here.

I’ve been waiting 15 years for Facebook to die. I’m more hopeful than ever

Cory Doctorow The Guardian 24 February 2022

Facebook is struggling to retain users, fending off regulation, trying to pivot to VR, and paying a massive wage premium to attract the workers it needs to make any of this happen. The company is on the ropes

‘After years of slowing US growth, Facebook just experienced its first-ever US shrinkage, which precipitated a $230bn stock crash, the largest in global corporate history.’
‘After years of slowing US growth, Facebook just experienced its first-ever US shrinkage, which precipitated a $230bn stock crash, the largest in global corporate history.’ Photograph: Jakub Porzycki/NurPhoto/REX/Shutterstock

I’ve been praying for Facebook’s collapse ever since it attained liftoff. In a 2007 article, I predicted that “your creepy ex-co-workers will kill Facebook” by demanding to know why you won’t “friend” them, prompting an exodus to the next platform. That was the social network cycle back then: a new network opens, and you and the people you genuinely like enjoy a rollicking group chat until all the people you have to pretend to like show up.

That’s the double-edged sword of products that rely on “network effects” – the economists’ term for a product that gets better when more people use it. Sure, you might join Facebook because your friends are all there (and more people might sign up because you’re there), but that also means that every time your friends leave Facebook, it’s a reason for you to leave, too.Advertisementhttps://c0100bfd1eb1c7da3e61c5a2da581cac.safeframe.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-38/html/container.html

My prediction failed. For a decade and a half, Facebook resisted the fate of all the social networks that preceded it. In hindsight, it’s easy to see why: it cheated. The company used investor cash to buy and neutralize competitors (“Kids are leaving Facebook for Insta? Fine, we’ll buy Insta. We know you value choice!”). It allegedly spied on users through the deceptive use of apps such as Onavo and exploited the intelligence to defeat rivals. More than anything, it ratcheted up “switching costs.”

“Switching costs” is another economic term: it means “the price you pay when you switch from one service to another.” Switching from Facebook to a rival means saying goodbye to the communities, friends and customers you hang out with on the platform. Normally, tech has really low switching costs: want to change from T-Mobile to Verizon? Just port your number. Your friends don’t even have to know you did; they can still call you and you them.

Tech’s rock-bottom switching costs are what kept the industry so dynamic in its early days. Microsoft could deploy an army of corporate salespeople to turn Microsoft Office into an industry standard, then Apple could come along and reverse-engineer the Office formats and make the interoperable iWork office suite. That means that Windows users could switch to the Mac and open their Word docs in Pages, their Excel spreadsheets in Numbers and their PowerPoints in Keynote.

It’s different for Facebook. The company’s ascendancy coincided with an overall concentration in the tech sector, and, with it, laws that protected winners of the latest round of the interoperability wars from new challengers. Apple was able to reverse-engineer its way out of the Microsoft Office trap, but woe betide a company that tries the same trick on Apple – try to make a program that lets you run iPhone apps on an Android device, or read the media files you buy in Apple’s book, movie or music stores, and you will quickly discover that the law is now on the sides of the giants, not the upstarts.

That same legal shift is how Facebook has kept its switching costs high. Fifteen years ago, it was safe to make a Facebook-MySpace bridge that would let you leave MySpace but stay in touch with your friends there by scraping your MySpace inbox and moving the waiting messages to your Facebook inbox. Try to build one of those bridges today – blasting an escape tunnel through Facebook’s walled garden – and Facebook will sue you until the rubble bounces.

But high switching costs have their limits. If you make your service terrible enough, a certain number of users will find the cost of switching preferable to the pain of staying. And as users leave, network effects start to work in reverse: though every user that joins makes your service more valuable, every user that leaves makes the service less valuable. If you’re only on Facebook to stay in touch with a small group of friends, each one of those friends who departs makes it easier for you to make the jump, too. And once you go, it’s even easier for the rest of the group to bail.

This is very bad news for Facebook. After years of slowing US growth, Facebook just experienced its first-ever US shrinkage, which precipitated a $230bn stock crash, the largest in global corporate history.

Though most of Facebook’s users are global, its US users generate far more profit than users in the rest of the world. Losing a US user is expensive. Even more important: the US is Facebook’s home base, and its US user base is its main bargaining chip in resisting US regulation, and in securing US support in its regulatory battles abroad.

Speaking of regulatory battles abroad: Facebook is on the brink of having its business model declared illegal under the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Fending off that scenario will depend on vast capital expenditures and friendly European regulators, and Facebook’s running short on both. Oh, and Europeans are Facebook’s second most valuable users.

Admittedly, when a company’s shares decline, it’s not like the company itself has lost any money – those losses hit shareholders, not the business itself. However, Facebook’s costs and share-price are intimately bound together, thanks to tech firms’ reliance on stock grants as a way of scoring a discount on their wage-bills. Engineers, lawyers, and other high-paid, in-demand professionals are glad to take much of their compensation in stock, betting that the company’s share price will balloon and that they can cash out their shares and keep their winnings, thanks to the tax-preferred status of capital gains – in most of the world, the wages you earn for doing useful work are taxed at a much higher rate than the winnings you get from lucky bets on stocks.

Even before its stock fell off a cliff, Facebook was mired in a multi-year hiring crisis. Nobody wanted to work for Facebook because it’s a terrible company that makes terrible products that everyone hates and only use because the company has rigged the system to punish users for switching.

Facebook was already paying a wage premium, offering sweeteners to in-demand workers in exchange for checking their consciences at the door. Those sweeteners mostly took the form of shares, which means that all those morally flexible “Metamates” got a hefty pay-cut when the company’s stock price fell off a cliff. Expect a lot of them to leave – and expect the company to have to pay even more to replace them. Companies with falling share prices can’t use share grants to attract workers.

Facebook is now famously trying to pivot (ugh) to virtual reality to save itself. It’s an expensive gambit. It’s going to alienate a lot of its users. It’s going to alienate a lot of its in-demand workers. It’s going to freak out a lot of regulators.

Meanwhile, the switching costs for people who want to jump ship keep getting lower. It’s not merely that fewer and fewer of the people you want to talk with are still on Facebook. Even if there’s someone whose virtual company you can’t bear to part with, lawmakers in the US and Europe are working on legislation that would force Facebook to allow third parties to “federate” new services with it. That would mean that you could quit Facebook and join an upstart rival – say, one by a privacy-respecting nonprofit or even a user-owned co-op – and still exchange messages with the communities, customers and family you left behind on Facebook’s sinking ship.

For 15 years, I’ve been waiting for Facebook to suffer the fate of every network-effects-driven success story – to experience the precipitous decline that is triggered by people leaving the service and taking the value they brought to it with them. Facebook now has to somehow retain users who are fed up to the eyeballs with its never-ending failures and scandals, while funding a pivot to VR, while fending off overlapping salvoes of global regulatory challenges to its business model, while paying a massive wage premium to attract and retain the workers that it needs to make any of this happen. All that, amid an exodus of its most valuable users and a frontal regulatory assault on its ability to extract revenues from those users’ online activities.

Stein’s Law holds that “if something cannot go on forever, it will stop.”

Facebook can’t go on forever.

  • Cory Doctorow is a science fiction author, activist and journalist. He is the author of many books, including the forthcoming book Chokepoint Capitalism, with Rebecca Giblin, about monopoly and fairness in the creative arts labor market. In 2020, he was inducted into the Canadian Science Fiction and Fantasy Hall of Fame

Three skills every film director needs – a practical guide

Melanie Killingsworth outlines the top skills needed for directors working between commercials, shorts and longer narrative projects.

by Melanie Killingsworth. ScreenHub. 22 February 2022

Melanie Killingsworth with her computer on location

A while back, I was on set directing a commercial product spot. At lunch everything was going smoothly. Three hours later, a bolt from the blue hit in the form of a snap lockdown. Not with a day or two notice, but five hours. Instead of finishing the day’s shotlist, ‘Hollywood wrapping’ our set overnight, and coming back the next day to finish shooting the rest, we had a few short hours to shoot everything we could, and pack down and bump out and get home.

Because we were working with a child as well as adults, much of the day had been structured around child legal requirements for limited hours and long breaks at regular intervals. Shots had been scheduled accordingly, so the footage we had was certainly not enough to form a complete piece. While my producer talked to the DP and crew about what time and assistance they’d need to get packed up, I talked to the client liaison about what sections of the final video they MOST wanted and needed. We decided we had about two hours to roll, and would shoot the rest of the adult’s parts and ‘cheat’ a few scenes with an adult instead of the planned child.

I picked a half dozen shots from my existing shotlist, came up with a few new ones, then presented it all to my DP and asked what order was best for set-up efficiency. We flew through the work as fast as could be safely done, packed up, and got out, everyone a bit in shock but working like the consummate professionals they are.

As we worked through the edit remotely (which included me trying to read notes more chickenscratch-y than usual), we were able to put together about 85% of the planned content, including all the most crucial parts, from only 50% of the shoot. I was happy, but most importantly the client was thrilled. 

While execution is absolutely down to having a great team around me, if my skills hadn’t been up to par, we could have floundered more, or not had a coherent end product. Much of what enabled me to pivot quickly was my experience in the creative space, from directing narrative fiction to story producing reality TV.

In the last year I’ve been doing more corporate and commercial directing work than before, including work with bigger, international companies. I’m not about to dump narrative fiction for commercial directing; they are different worlds, and my heart and skills are best in the former. But many of the skills overlap, and we can learn a lot from one which carries over to the other. I want to look at three of the biggest crossover skills: turning on a dime, holding on not-too-tightly to your vision, and valuing your team.

(For the sake of this post we’ll take budget out of the equation. Of course, you can sometimes solve by ‘throwing money at the problem’ but sometimes you can avoid money loss if you’re good enough at the above skills, which are required on anything from student shoots to Marvel movies. Plenty of big narrative/fiction shoots have money piles as big as corporate or commercial work, but most of us work our way up through both worlds, and the learning curve at comparable levels is the same. The three skills are useful at every budget level in both worlds.)

1. Turning on a Dime

It’s broad generalisation to say ‘creative filmmaking faces more unique roadblocks than corporate or commercial filmmaking’ but it’s often true. Roadblocks pop up more in creative spaces because filming duration and conditions are drastically different. 

Corporate spots and commercials usually run for days, not months. They are often in controlled environments or studio spaces. The team is usually a handful of people instead of dozens to hundreds. If an actor falls ill, they are replaced. If a location is unavailable, you can use a similar one nearby which doesn’t need to ‘match’ anything. People work to the shoot’s strict schedule and needs or they aren’t hired for the project.

On long TV fiction shoots and films such as documentaries, Richard Linklater’s Boyhood, anything the elder Coppola makes, etc., you shoot in blocks spread over years. During that time, the DP needs a week off for their daughter’s wedding; the 1AD lands in the hospital; an actor’s family member passes away; catering gives half the crew a nasty case of norovirus; some producer in a swanky office 1,000 miles away very wrongly decides to fire half your PA team to save money; a script rewrite or wardrobe disaster necessitates reshooting a scene from weeks ago; a freak accident wipes multiple SD cards. All this and more has happened on shoots I’ve worked. (The footage wipe was ascribed to ‘super powerful magnets’ and ‘a haunted location’ – your theory may vary.) All these required rejiggering everything from schedule to budget to contracts to the script itself, sometimes all of the above.

While many logistics are handled by wonderful ADs and producers, a director must shift gears, too. What does it mean for your shotlist and blocking rehearsal if you’re filming in a backup location? How do you engage with actors if you’re shooting a scene which was meant to be two weeks from now, the dialogue has changed, or they need emotional preparation before shooting heavy material? What do you do when the lensing looks nothing like what pre-vis promised? How do you react if you’re halfway through scene coverage and realise you screwed up, and the shot you’ve spent 40 minutes setting up crosses a line and will cause problems in editing? What if halfway through a scene you’re out of time and must drop three of your remaining four shots: which shot is more important for the edit? the emotional beats? the character arc? What do you do if the answer to those questions are all different shots?

You have to think fast, send a quick prayer to all gods you do or don’t believe in, and commit to your choices. Then, however you feel about it, confidently, clearly communicate your choices to all parties. 

Depending on the situation, you or your AD may make an announcement: ‘OK folks, we are going to [insert overview here], so let’s start with [specific actionable items your AD can facilitate]’. EG ‘We are going to drop the wides and concentrate on a medium two-shot. After that we’ll pick up one closeup of Actor A’s hand stubbing out her cigarette. IF we have time we will do one of the two planned closeups on Actor B. While camera and lights get set for the two-shot, the director will chat to the actors. Everyone else see department heads for information about bumping out anything we don’t need.’ Ask if anyone has questions, then light a fire under it.

Which is exactly what we did when lockdown fell like a hammer smashing all our beautiful preparation to bits. Two minutes of hand-wringing and double checking that we couldn’t, in fact, finish the shoot as planned. Then deep breath, massive pivot, decisions and communication flying through the air.

When you’re moving that quickly, you’ve got to be pragmatic and let go of things including shots you really wanted, emotional beats your actor would have nailed, lighting setups you had painstakingly studied. The better you know your creative vision and your processes, the better you’ll be able to jettison shots and scenes as needed. It won’t be painless, but it will get you through.

‘Know what you want’ applies to all aspects of directing. I once worked on a short film with a director who had a firm grasp on what performance he wanted from the actors … and nothing else. He didn’t know what angles or framing he preferred, he didn’t care about makeup and wardrobe, he had no strong opinions on lighting and colour. He thought he would ‘leave that up to those departments.’

Perhaps he even congratulated himself on being generous or ‘collaborative,’ but all he did was cause confusion. It created a power vacuum which led to the DP essentially directing all shots, the gaffer trying to direct the lighting, makeup being done wrong for the lighting, etc. (It finally climaxed in one of the single biggest fuckups I have ever seen on a film set, which would have turned full-on fistfight had not a crew member intervened. But that’s a story for a different time.) Point is: know something about every department, and care about all of it.

Know and care, and be willing to hold out for what matters. Lulu Wang was given offers to make The Farewell with a few key changes, including casting a Big Name White Guy. She stuck to her guns, passing on Netflix to eventually sign with A24 because they let her keep the core of her vision.

Absolutely know what you want and be willing to fight for it in this industry, so long as you retain willingness and ability to drop the fight when it becomes harmful or counter-productive. The tricky part is being careful a firm grip doesn’t become a stranglehold.

2. Hold On (not too tightly) To Your Creative Vision

Every week filmmakers see KNOW WHAT YOU WANT AND GO FOR IT AND ACCEPT NO COMPROMISE! messages, especially around our careers, double especially around ‘directorial vision.’ Tales of Fincher’s insistence on not rolling until every spec of dust is exactly where he demands, and Kubrick’s perfectionism, are held up as aspirational. But remember:

Film is compromise, highness. Anyone who says differently is selling their bad producer services.

Compromise is inherent in filmmaking. Some compromise is forced by budget or circumstances, while some is solely creative. If Coppola compromised a dozen different ways (probably 100 fewer than he should have) to make Apocalypse Now, you can compromise on your shoot. 

Holding on to your vision can be the right choice, even if it is more expensive, postpones your projects for years, makes you despair, or isn’t understood by anyone around you. But lack of compromise can also result in your project never getting made, being so much worse than if you had let experienced voices make changes, or missing when something better presents itself particularly when it comes to casting someone who wasn’t what you originally envisioned.

So, how do you know when to change and when to stand firm? Lean in close … closer … 

FUCK UP. A lot. Make a mistake in accepting feedback when you should have held your original idea. Reject someone’s suggestion and spend the rest of your life looking at that short film and knowing “that scene would have been perfect had I just done what they said.” Learn by doing.

Compromise takes practice, and corporate and commercial sets are great places to get that practice. You’ll have ample opportunities to compromise, and you have other masters to answer to. Whether you’re hired to direct because the client likes your vision, your pitch, or your former work, you’re not really there to direct YOUR VISION (TM). You’re there to best shape a thousand disparate elements into their vision, hopefully while still holding your artistic choices. Their vision is shaped by everything from market research, to what their boss wants, to the latest video dropped by their competitor last Friday, to technical specs from their web designer. You must be malleable, letting go of what you really super duper want even if it is truly more brilliant, or you just ‘feel it in your heart,’ or it drives an actual story while they’re keen for ‘cool clips randomly strung together.’ In this way you can learn when to compromise, and how to do it effectively and gracefully.

On corporate sets you get input from 18 directions and mostly have to concede, but on a creative set where the buck stops with YOU, who do you accept the input from? The answer is: anybody! Does your grip have an idea how to give your lighting a sharper edge? Does your PA think a line of dialogue would be more authentic if you swap a word for a different slang term? Maybe your grip recently did something similar, your PA is from a similar background to your character, or perhaps they simply have good ideas of their own accord. Take those ideas on board. If your vision is strong enough, it will stand up to the ideas which won’t work, and if you’ve put a good team around you they will have ideas and vision which will add value merely by being considered, even if not enacted.

Which brings us to:

3. Valuing Your Team

This is, sadly, something the creative side often doesn’t do as well as most corporate and commercial gigs. Many times a commercial client won’t have a strong grasp of every department’s job, so they’re more likely to let professionals exercise their skills, an appreciation sometimes missing in film directors. I believe a director must know a good deal about every department, and a lot about at least one key department (acting, editing, cinematography, art design, etc) but it’s equally as important we realise we are not the editor, DP, or actor.

We work with them, not above them. When working with them, we must value them. I don’t mean “pick a team who are very good at their jobs,” a lot of creatives of course want that. We must truly consider their input, treat them with respect, express our gratitude, and be professional.

Treating cast and crew with respect and working with-not-above them are inextricable. It should go without saying never to yell at or be inappropriate with cast and crew, but I’ve been on sets so I’ll say it again: never yell at or be inappropriate with your cast and crew. 

Express your gratitude. Do this at the end of a shoot, when someone goes above and beyond (if you don’t notice some of these moments, you’re not a good director), and do it on the regular. If you can’t say thank you to craft services accomodating your allergies and making your coffee, the AC staying late to wrangle data, or the film student or teamster driving you around, if you don’t appreciate what your producer is doing behind the scenes, look harder and practice. No excuses. 

Corporate environments can be as toxic or thoughtless as any other, but most short corporate gigs at the least send a ‘thank you’ for a job well done, in-person recognition, bottle of wine, etc. Perhaps because it’s more out of their wheelhouse they’re more conscious of noting the appreciation for ‘outside’ talent, but it’s a gesture which should be extended to all sets. It’s nice to have your talent and hard work appreciated!

Last, the biggest one: it’s not just about considering everyone’s input and saying and meaning thank you, but running your set like a professional space, WHICH IT IS. Corporate shoots often stay up to the standards of the company which is hiring a team for the shoot, but I’ve been on a lot of creative sets with horrible practices: emotional abuse; wanton fire hazards; asking crew to endanger themselves; expectations of working 16-18 hour days while logging 12 on the time card. Often this is covered with a guise of ‘creativity’ and ‘doing it because you love it.’ Sincerely: fuck all that.

Now, I’ve worked for free in my career (as almost anyone in the arts has and must, unfortunately), and some of those sets have been wonderful experiences for learning, networking, friendship, creativity, or all of the above. If you are asking people to work for free or no pay, you have the exact same responsibility – I argue even higher – to keep your crew safe, well fed, and within reasonable working hours. This topic could be an entire book, but I’ll lay out a few things under the umbrella of ‘be damn professional’ and wrap up.

If a crew member isn’t performing up to scratch, give them a chance to change along with actionable ways to do so. If they won’t or can’t, improve, let them go. It’s neither fair nor safe to everyone else to keep them on.

When you’re wrong, say sorry. We all have bad days, say thoughtless things, are distracted or dismissive. Don’t fall into the trap of ‘it’s a high pressure environment’ or ‘they probably didn’t notice’ or ‘that boom op is only on set today.’ Good leadership is never above apologising, publicly if necessary. You’re the director. Learn to lead, or get out of the way.

Keep to your plans within reason-ish. Your crew prepare based on your shotlist, your schedule, your script. If you change on every whim, your team can’t work to their potential. That said, film sets are spaces for creativity and spontaneity, and if you can’t accept better options when presented; reread the section about about not holding on TOO tight. Magic happens, and is wonderful, but don’t mistake “making it all up on the go” for “magic.” Accept things will go wildly wrong and require you to ditch your plans or go wildly right and require drawing new blueprints on the spot. 

If you say ‘thank you’ every five minutes, get a taco truck for series wrap, buy every PA a ticket for Friday raffle, and never scream at anyone, BUT don’t think grips deserve a living wage, don’t intervene when the producer throws a tantrum at the scripty, demand a boom op do something unsafe, or insist on 16 hour days knowing crew have to get themselves home: you don’t value your team, and you shouldn’t work in this industry til you can.

More than most industries, filmmaking is ‘learn on the job,’ and the high attrition rate is partly because you don’t know whether it’s for you until you’re already in the deep end. Directing is something you can learn about in the classroom and through film study, but can’t truly learn until you’re doing, doing regularly, and failing at sometimes. But if you’re looking for ways to develop your directing skills (as well as, let’s be real, making enough money to live on) the best thing you can do is work across different spaces, and take the best lessons from both the creative shoots and those corporate paycheck jobs.

Melanie Killingsworth is a director and showrunner with more than a decade’s experience in American and Australian productions, including short films, feature documentaries, reality TV, and narrative fiction films and series. She wrote and directed her first short – a 26-minute black-and-white neo noir – in 2013.

Binge orders Patrick Brammall and Harriet Dyer rom-com ‘Colin from Accounts’

by Jackie Keast IF Magazine February 13, 2022

Patrick Brammall and Harriet Dyer.

Husband and wife team Patrick Brammall and Harriet Dyer are the creators, writers and stars of rom-com Colin From Accounts, the latest project to be commissioned by Binge.

Now shooting in Sydney, the eight-episode series centres on Ashley (Dyer) and Gordon (Brammall), two single(ish), complex humans who are brought together by a car accident and an injured dog.  

Trent O’Donnell, Matt Moore, and Madeleine Dyer direct the Easy Tiger Productions and CBS Studios project. Rob Gibson and Ian Collie produce for Easy Tiger with executive producers Brammall, Harriet Dyer, O’Donnell, Alison Hurbert-Burns and Brian Walsh.

IF understands Emma Paine is the cinematographer, though Binge declined to share details of other heads of department at this stage.

Colin From Accounts has been in train at Binge for two years, brought to executive director Hurbert-Burns by Gibson – the pair having previously worked together at Stan.

It marks the Foxtel-owned service’s second original commission since its launch in May 2020, the first being romantic drama Love Me, which started streaming Boxing Day last year.

While there are undoubtedly pressures in determining a service’s first originals, Hurbert-Burns tells IF it didn’t take a lot to get Binge on board here.

From early Zoom meetings with Brammall and Dyer, she and Foxtel executive director of television Walsh could see it would be funny. When the first script came through, she found herself laughing out loud.

In the same way Love Me was designed to feel like a tonic for audiences after two years of a pandemicColin From Accounts aims to bring levity to people’s busy lives.

“Lifes complicated. Relationships aren’t straightforward. Both these characters are doing the best that they can – maybe yet to reach full stride and hit their potential. A little bit of needing to get out of the way of themselves in order to connect fully with another person. I liked how that was done through humour… It’s grounded. It’s realistic,” Hurbert-Burns tells IF.

“These are characters that you could imagine living in Newtown or Newcastle on King Street. I think that’s a really good way in, because it’s not glossy or too distant; you can imagine who these people are. You’ve met people like these characters. And the path to love is not straightforward. This one includes a dog, a car crash and a bit of a hot mess.

Easy Tiger’s Gibson and Collie said: “Dyer, Brammall, rom-com, cute dog: what’s not to love? It’s a delight to be working on this hilarious and big-hearted show with Harriet, Patrick, Trent, Matt and Maddy, which is a ridiculous amount of talent all in the one place. 

“We’re very grateful to our partners at BINGE and CBS Studios, who immediately saw the appeal of Colin from Accounts for their audiences in Australia and around the world, and also of course to Screen Australia and Screen NSW for their wonderful support.”

As for what is next for Binge, which recently reached 1 million subscribers, Hurbert-Burns says it is currently “working out what is next for Love Me“, hinting that there may be a second instalment. Beyond this, she is looking for pitches that stop her in her tracks, particularly great drama. She notes her previous advice to IF still stands: “beautiful dramas and comedies that are broad in their appeal.”

Colin From Accounts distributed outside Australia and New Zealand by ViacomCBS Global Distribution Group. Major production funding comes via Screen Australia with support from Screen NSW.